Re: [RFC] Infrared Keycode standardization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> The biggest challenge with that approach is that lirc is still
> maintained out-of-kernel, and the inputdev solution does not require
> lirc at all (which is good for inexperienced end users who want their
> product to "just work").

If distros started packing lirc as a basic system daemon things would
generally just work too.  After all, there is plenty of other user space
software one needs to do anything.

> The other big issue is that right now remotes get associated
> automaticallywith products as part of the device profile.  While this
> has the disadvantage that there is not a uniform mechanism to specify
> a different remote than the one that ships with the product, it does
> have the advantage of the product working "out-of-the-box" with
> whatever remote it came with.  It's a usability issue, but what I
> would consider a pretty important one.

lirc isn't limited to one remote at a time.  You can have many different
remotes supported at once.  So it's not always necessary to know which
remote you have before the remote will work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux