On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 01:01:51PM +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:47:14 Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 01:37:20PM +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > <snip> > > > > I think the refactoring should be done first. I don't believe it is > > > that much work and experience shows that it is better to do this right > > > away while you are still motivated :-) > > > > hehehe.. Yes, that's what I was expecting :-). No problem. I've started > > it. I will resend the series once I've completed the re-factoring and I > > 've made some testing after that. I hope tomorrow or so. > > > > > The string control support should not go into 2.6.31. I would like to > > > do that only in the v4l-dvb tree (so it will appear in 2.6.32) since I > > > want to give that a bit more time to mature. I implemented it very > > > quickly and I do not feel comfortable queueing this for 2.6.31. > > > > Right. Yes, better to test the stuff a bit more. > > > > > In addition it is still unclear if Mauro will merge my v4l-dvb-subdev2 > > > tree for 2.6.31. I hope so, since otherwise it will hamper the > > > development of this and other embedded platforms. > > > > Ok. > > > > > I also need to add a new V4L2_CAP_MODULATOR (which needs a review as > > > well). > > > > > > And finally I realized that we need to add some v4l2_modulator > > > capabilities for the RDS encoder similar to the upcoming v4l2_tuner RDS > > > capabilities as is described in this RFC: > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media%40vger.kernel.org/msg02498.html > > > > > > I haven't had time to implement this RFC and I know that is not going > > > to make 2.6.31. It's now almost at the top of my TODO list, so it > > > should go in soon (pending unforeseen circumstances). > > > > Ok. I'll take a look at it. > > I've worked on this yesterday. You can take a look at my v4l-dvb-rds tree. > Both the API and the documentation of it in the v4l2-spec is in there. I > started work on updating the few RDS decoders that we have, but that is not > yet in that tree. > > > > As a result of rereading this RFC I also started to wonder about > > > whether the si4713 supports the MMBS functionality. Do you know > > > anything about that? > > > > No. Not that I know. Can you point some link? > > http://www.rds.org.uk/rdsfrdsrbds.html > > But I've just read here: > > http://www.rds.org.uk/rds98/pdf/rdsForum_standards_090414_8.pdf > > that MMBS is discontinued. I'll need to investigate this further, but if > this is indeed true then this can be removed completely from our RDS > decoder and encoder APIs. Yes, better to double check. At least with si4713, I haven't heard anything about this. > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > -- > Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
