On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> >> <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, >> >> > review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a >> >> > (manually-created) quilt-series is at >> >> > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next >> >> > history branch, commit ID in 0000-base file. Don't be surprised, that >> >> > patch-set also contains a few not directly related patches. >> >> >> >> Testing on Migo-R board with 2.6.30-rc2-git-something and the >> >> following cherry-picked patches: >> >> >> >> 0007-driver-core-fix-driver_match_device.patch >> >> 0033-soc-camera-host-driver-cleanup.patch >> >> 0034-soc-camera-remove-an-extra-device-generation-from-s.patch >> >> 0035-soc-camera-simplify-register-access-routines-in-mul.patch >> >> and part of 0036 (avoiding rejects, ap325 seems broken btw) >> > >> > Have I broken it or is it unrelated? >> >> 2.6.30-rc seems broken on Migo-R. A quick check suggests the following: > > Ok, before we come to Migo-R, what is with ap325? Have I broken it with > this my series or is it a different problem? Not sure. I used 2.6.30-rc but I guess your patches are aimed at linux-next. >> V4L/DVB (10141): OK >> V4L/DVB (10672): BAD >> V4L/DVB (11024): BAD > > These seem to be pretty random snapshots... Are they all on Linus' master > or on next or on v4l-dvb? You did pick up the > > 0007-driver-core-fix-driver_match_device.patch Yeah, I tried that one. I'm not sure what was the problem, but it's gone now. Today I've tested the following on top of linux-2.6 (stable 2.6.30-rc) d91dfbb41bb2e9bdbfbd2cc7078ed7436eab027a 0033-soc-camera-host-driver-cleanup.patch 0034-soc-camera-remove-an-extra-device-generation-from-s.patch 0035-soc-camera-simplify-register-access-routines-in-mul.patch So far OK. However, applying 0036- or v2 from the mailing list results in rejects (probably because linux-next vs linux-2.6 differences) but the files should not affect Migo-R. So with 0036 or v2 applied it builds ok for Migo-R, but I can't open /dev/video0 for some reason. Reverting the patch and only using 0033->0035 above results in ok /dev/video0 opening. What are your dependencies? I'll try out your 20090415/series on top of the matching linux-next for now. / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
