On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:41:16PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:15:34PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Wondering, if it still will work then... At least it compiles. BTW, should > > > it really also work with IMX? Then you might want to change this > > > > > > depends on VIDEO_DEV && ARCH_MX1 && SOC_CAMERA > > > > > > to > > > > > > depends on VIDEO_DEV && (ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_IMX) && SOC_CAMERA > > > > This shouldn't be necessary. ARCH_IMX does not have the platform part to > > make use of this driver and will never get it. > > Confused... Then why the whole that "IMX/MX1" in the driver? And why will > it never get it - are they compatible or not? Not just compatible, they are the same. A little bit of history: I originally brought i.MX1 support to the kernel in the early 2.6 days. around 2.6.25 Freescale pushed initial i.MX31 support using plat-mxc. We in turn based our i.MX27 port on this code and since then it evolved further. Darius based a new i.MX1 support on this code and now we can remove arch-imx. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
