Uri, I didn't started yet to analyse your patch series, but the subject of this message called my attention. Backport patches is something that should never go upstream. On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Uri Shkolnik <urishk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Uri Shkolnik <uris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > # Date 1238758726 -10800 > # Node ID c582116cfbb96671629143fced33e3f88c28b3c7 > # Parent 856813745905e07d9fc6be5e136fdf7060c6fc37 > siano: smsdvb - add support for old dvb-core version > > From: Uri Shkolnik <uris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Multiple user takes the new driver sources from the LinuxTV > repository, but neglect to upgrade the dvb-core (this is > true especially for tiny and embedded device). This patch > enables the smsdvb to work with older version of dvb-core. > > This patch also add one more handling of message endianity. Never mix two different issues on the same patch. In this specific case, since the backport patch will be removed from upstream submission, the message endian changes should be on a separate patch, in order to get its way upstream. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
