On Monday 30 March 2009 14:37:22 Alexey Klimov wrote: > Hello, Hans > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mauro, > > > > For your information, this is the current status: > > > > - Steve Toth tested the HVR-1800 for me, so I've posted the pull request for > > the converted cx23885 driver. > > > > - The cx88 driver is also finished. I'm waiting for a last test by Jean > > Delvare before I post that one as well. > > > > - Added support for saa6588 to saa7134: needed to drop the legacy i2c API > > from saa6588. This is in my pull request for my v4l-dvb tree. > > > > - Douglas has almost finished the em28xx driver conversion. > > > > - Jean Delvare is working on the ir-kbd-i2c conversion. > > > > That last conversion is stand-alone (i.e. has no impact on the internal v4l > > API) and I don't think it prevents pushing our v4l-dvb changes to 2.6.30. > > > > When the first four items are finished and merged into v4l-dvb, then I have > > a to do a few final cleanup actions to make everything ready for the 2.6.30 > > merge: > > > > - Remove v4l2-i2c-drv-legacy.h from the remaining i2c drivers. Remove the > > files v4l2-i2c-drv-legacy.h and v4l2-common.c since these are no longer > > used. Cleanup v4l2-common.h since the internal ioctls are no longer needed. > > Update v4l2-framework.txt, removing any references to the legacy behavior. > > > > - Fix two subdev callbacks that are in the wrong place (s_std belongs to the > > video ops, s_standby belongs to the tuner ops). > > > > - Add a load_fw callback to the core ops and use that were appropriate > > instead of the init callback. Analyze whether the init callback can be > > removed altogether. > > > > - Analyze how the probe addresses are used in the v4l2 drivers and move > > those lists over to the appropriate i2c driver headers. > > > > - Add enum_frameintervals and enum_framesizes callbacks for use with omap. > > > > - Check for any remaining uses of I2C_DRIVERID and remove them. > > > > This shouldn't take much time to implement. > > So, if you converted pci-isa radio drivers to v4l2_device. Should > dsbr100, si470x, and mr800 be converted to v4l2_device too ? > Eventually, yes. But I did those pci-isa radio drivers basically for fun and because I got hold of two of those ISA cards so I could test it as well. However, this v4l2_device conversion isn't urgent, unlike the v4l2_subdev conversion. But it will have to be done eventually, and it is pretty trivial at the moment. So I'd appreciate it if you could spend a bit of time on it. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
