Well I am confused now...Should I still convert the atmel ISI driver to
a soc driver?
My concern was not to release a driver for the ov9655, but to have one
which is working so I could test my atmel-soc driver :)
Because I only have an ov9655 sensor here...
Regards
Sedji
Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit :
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit :
Wouldn't ov9655 be similar enough to ov9650 as used in stk-sensor.c? Hans,
would that one also be converted to v4l2-device? If so, Sedji, you don't
need to write yet another driver for it.
I had a look at the stk-sensor file. Does it follow the soc arch?
No, it does not. But soc-camera is going to be converted to v4l2-device,
so, if stkweb is going to be converted too, then the driver will be
re-used.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
