On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems like the real complaint is that dealing v4l-dvb's development > system is more work for those people who choose not to use it. Why don't > we just switch to CVS while were at it, to make it easier for those who > don't want to learn git? Personally, the problem for me is not one of which source control system we use. I don't care if it's cvs, svn, bzr, hg, or git. What I do care about is what the tree contains. I do all of my development on a stock Ubuntu box that is running the latest stable release (Intrepid right now). I want to do v4l-dvb development, but I do *not* want to be required to run the bleeding edge kernel. I want to do v4l-dvb development without having to worry about whether my wireless chipset is going to work today, or my video driver. Having a stable distro allows me to focus on *my* driver without being susceptible to breakage unrelated to my work. I know I'm not the only one who develops with this model. This is not just an issue about the people looking to test the tree. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller http://www.devinheitmueller.com AIM: devinheitmueller -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
