Hi Agustin, On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Agustin wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > ---- Mensaje original ---- > > De: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:03:38AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > > > > > Tested with 8 bit Bayer and 8 bit monochrome video. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > > --- > > > > Acked-by: Sascha Hauer > > for the platform part. I can't say much to the driver itself. > > > > Sascha > > > > > > > > This is how I expect this driver to appear in my pull request. So, please, > > > review, test heavily :-) > > I want to test it but while applying to mxc-master branch I observed > that you use it on top of, at least, framebuffer stuff: #include > <mach/mx3fb.h>. You probably mean the [PATCH/FYI 3/4] soc-camera: board bindings for camera host driver for i.MX3x SoCs patch, not the one you're replying to. And the "3/4" says "FYI", i.e., it is not yet for submission, only for reference. > Should I apply fb patchset in order to make this one work? (Otherwise, I > can proceed with a minor merging effort.) Well, the camera itself doesn't require the framebuffer. So, if you're not planning to display your video, you can decide for yourself - whether to apply fb patches or to merge camera patches without fb. > I am already using your drivers in their original version, I can get > some new pictures with this one pretty soon. Great! Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
