On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05:40AM -0500, Steven Toth wrote: >> Does anyone know what might be going on? These very same tuner cards >> worked fine in the old system (Intel P4 3.0GHz CPU and Abit IC7 >> motherboard) for close to two years. > > Determine whether this is an RF issue, or a DMA corruption issue: Ahh, I didn't even think of RF. I didn't have any RF problems in the old system (that I know of) so that didn't even cross my mind. I actually was, and still am, more afraid of DMA issues, though. > 1. Check the RF SNR of the digital cards using femon, anything odd going > on when the PVR250 is running? Does it fall out of lock or SNR dip > dangerously low, bursts of BER's? Here are some 10 second captures from femon. Card1 and Card2 are ATSC 115s. Card4 and Card5 are PVR x50s. Card1 recording by itself: status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e4dc | ber 000000b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e682 | ber 00000038 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe60 | snr e682 | ber 00000078 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe80 | snr e624 | ber 000000a0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e682 | ber 000000d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e598 | ber 00000140 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e654 | ber 00000078 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e6b2 | ber 00000090 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e654 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe60 | snr e654 | ber 000000d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK Card1 and Card4 recording: status SCVYL | signal fe80 | snr e5c6 | ber 000000b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e682 | ber 00000100 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e53a | ber 000000c8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e568 | ber 00000130 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e624 | ber 000000b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe80 | snr e654 | ber 000000c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe20 | snr e6b2 | ber 000000c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e682 | ber 00000028 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe60 | snr e654 | ber 000000d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e624 | ber 000000c8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK Card1 and Card5 recording: status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e624 | ber 00000120 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe80 | snr e654 | ber 000000d0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e598 | ber 00000238 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e682 | ber 000000c8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal feb0 | snr e654 | ber 00000068 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe90 | snr e654 | ber 00000118 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal feb0 | snr e6e0 | ber 00000038 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e4dc | ber 00000060 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e44e | ber 00000058 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fea0 | snr e5c6 | ber 000000d0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK Card2 recording by itself: status SCVYL | signal fe20 | snr e53a | ber 00000130 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe20 | snr e53a | ber 000000b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe30 | snr e3c0 | ber 00000128 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe20 | snr e3c0 | ber 000000a8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e568 | ber 00000060 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe00 | snr e4dc | ber 00000058 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe10 | snr e53a | ber 00000098 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fde0 | snr e4dc | ber 00000118 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe10 | snr e568 | ber 00000168 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fdf0 | snr e53a | ber 000001a0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK Card2 and Card4 recording: status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e4ac | ber 000000d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e624 | ber 000001b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e598 | ber 000000a8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e5c6 | ber 000000b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e53a | ber 000000d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e50a | ber 00000098 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe10 | snr e50a | ber 000000a0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe10 | snr e598 | ber 000000b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe30 | snr e5f6 | ber 000000c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe60 | snr e568 | ber 00000180 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK Card2 and Card5 recording status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e4ac | ber 000000b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e598 | ber 00000190 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e598 | ber 00000118 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe80 | snr e5c6 | ber 00000008 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe50 | snr e568 | ber 000000c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e5c6 | ber 00000178 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e53a | ber 00000120 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe70 | snr e50a | ber 00000168 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe60 | snr e598 | ber 000000b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK status SCVYL | signal fe40 | snr e5c6 | ber 000000f8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK I don't see anything significant there. > 2. Move the two cards as far apart as possible in the slots in the system > and repeat the test above, any better? > > What happens? This will require rmoving cards. The old system had 5 PCI slots and I had a small ethernet NIC between the pair of 115s and x50s. The new system only has 4 PCI slots so both pairs are in adjacent slots. I'll try pulling the x50s one at a time this evening when I get home. David -- David Engel david@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
