Hi Guennadi, Valentin Longchamp wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> I uploaded my current patch-stack for the i.MX31 Camera Sensor Interface >> to http://gross-embedded.homelinux.org/~lyakh/i.MX31-20090124/ (to be >> submitted later, hopefully for 2.6.30). As stated in 0000-base-unknown, >> these patches shall be used on top of the >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/async_tx.git tree >> "upstream" branch. >> > > I have tested your patchset on our mx31moboard system. However, I would > like some precisions on how things should be registered. > I am now able to register a camera device on the soc_camera bus with mx3_camera, I had not initialized well the bus_id for my platform device. After struggling with a few minor hardware bugs, I am now able to register a MT9T031 camera (actually we have a MT9T001 for testing, but they are very similar). So things seem to be working fine. I am testing it with the capture.c example from v4linux. But the mt9t031 only supports bayer format atm (I could try to work on it, but first I need to validate our hardware design by grabbing real images), could someone point me to an easy way of converting this bayer format to something readable (maybe a raw image for gimp, that's what I am trying to do now) ? By the way, Guennadi, if you want me to test something more extensively, don't hesitate to ask me about it. Thanks again for your patch. Val -- Valentin Longchamp, PhD Student, EPFL-STI-LSRO1 valentin.longchamp@xxxxxxx, Phone: +41216937827 http://people.epfl.ch/valentin.longchamp MEA3485, Station 9, CH-1015 Lausanne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
