* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 17:43 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > -#include <asm/types.h> > > > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > > > #include <linux/ioctl.h> > > > > > > Awesome, you've just broken the userspace build of kvm as the > > > file linux/types.h conflicts with sys/types.h. > > > > > > > What I did is absolutely right. > > > > If there is any conflict then we need to solve it in better way. > > > > Can you please share what is the conflict and what you are expecting and > > what you are getting. > > I fear that the problem might be more widespread than just kvm. > The problem is that <linux/types.h> without __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES > defines the standard types that glibc provides in its own <sys/types.h>, > some of them even defined differently (e.g. the size of off_t depends > __USE_FILE_OFFSET64). > > You should be able to do > > #include <sys/types.h> > #define __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES > #include <linux/types.h> > > or > > #include <sys/types.h> > #include <asm/types.h> > > but not without the __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES! This means that the > mass-conversion to <linux/types.h> was flawed and should be fixed > before 2.6.29 to avoid more trouble. agreed. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html