On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 22:00 -0500, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jason Siegel <siegeljb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks Andy, > > > > That did the trick! QAM256 is working! > > > > -J Jason, Glad it worked for you. > Really? That made a difference? Sure, I was expecting general tuning > performance to improve, but I'm a bit surprised if it really makes the > difference between "works with QAM256" and "doesn't work with QAM256". > > Devin Devin, Well, since you noted a failure mechanism with a symptom of "not all channels lock within X seconds", why couldn't it be the case that the same mechanism causes "no channels lock within X seconds"? :) Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
