Hi Trent,
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:01:08 -0800 (PST), Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:20:19 -0800 (PST)
> > Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem like any other driver needs to protect the module device
> > > table with an ifdef.
> >
> > However, Zoran driver doesn't rely on pci_register_driver(). Instead, it uses a
> > while() loop to probe for Zoran devices:
> >
> > static int __devinit
> > find_zr36057 (void)
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > zoran_num = 0;
> > while (zoran_num < BUZ_MAX &&
> > (dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ZORAN, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ZORAN_36057, dev)) != NULL) {
> > ...
> > }
>
> Yuck, why don't we fix this instead?
>
> Here's an initial test. I haven't yet found my dc10+ to test it with.
I'm all for it, but what tree was your patch built against? It doesn't
seem to apply to anything I have.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
