Re: [PATCH v5] rust: alloc: satisfy POSIX alignment requirement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:58 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:47:11PM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > Looks like I wasn't the only one to fall into the trap (rust/kernel/io.rs):
> >
> >     #[inline]
> >     const fn io_addr_assert<U>(&self, offset: usize) -> usize {
> >         build_assert!(Self::offset_valid::<U>(offset, SIZE));
> >
> >         self.addr() + offset
> >     }
> >
> > since offset isn't known at compile time, this can easily be misused?
>
> Well, that's intentional.
>
> iomem.readb(0x0)     // succeeds if SIZE >=1
> iomem.readb(foo)     // fails if foo is not known at compile time

By "fails" here you mean fail to link, right?

> iomem.try_readb(foo) // succeeds if self.maxsize() >= 1

Apologies for being dense throughout this discussion. Could you check
my understanding?

The trick is that `build_error` is marked `#[export_name =
"rust_build_error"]` which isn't exported unless
CONFIG_RUST_BUILD_ASSERT_ALLOW is defined, causing linking to it to
fail. This even works for doctests, but not for #[test] in the kernel
crate because they are built as part of the crate. The only to way
make that work correctly is to put `build_error` in a crate all by
itself.





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux