On 11/19/24 11:18 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Carlos, > Am Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 08:29:34AM -0500 schrieb Carlos O'Donell: >> On 11/17/24 5:46 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >>> Without further ado, the following was found: >>> >>> Issue: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-open.c: 930: >>> _dl_open: Assertion `_dl_debug_update (args.nsid)->r_state == >>> RT_CONSISTENT' failed! >> >> This is no translation for this assertion failure. > > Sorry for beeing unclear. This is not about translating the string. > One of our translators tried out the example given in sprof(1) and > came across this message. > > So the question is: > Is the example correct, despite the failure? The example looks correct to me. We have glibc/elf/tst-sprof-basic.sh to verify basic operation of sprof (though we test it wrapped using the newly built ld.so, so we might improve this with a containerized test). It doesn't fail for me on a glibc-2.39 test system I have right now, but I haven't verified the data is correct either. If this is failing for you please submit a bug upstream to glibc and we'll review. > And if yes, maybe this failure should be mentioned in the man page. We shouldn't document every bug in the man-pages. We should verify the examples keep working though. > As a side note: > We translators regularly check if messages are translated or not, so > in this case we would *not* translate the output ourselves, but leave > it in English, of course. Thank you! -- Cheers, Carlos.
