On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 10:46:23AM GMT, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Without further ado, the following was found: > > Issue: B<sched_get_priority_min>() POSIX.1 → B<sched_get_priority_min>(). POSIX.1 > > "The range of scheduling priorities may vary on other POSIX systems, thus it " > "is a good idea for portable applications to use a virtual priority range and " > "map it to the interval given by B<sched_get_priority_max>() and " > "B<sched_get_priority_min>() POSIX.1 requires a spread of at least 32 " > "between the maximum and the minimum values for B<SCHED_FIFO> and B<SCHED_RR>." Fixed. Thanks! Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
