fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-man <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no?
From: enh <enh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:40:16 -0400

subject says it all... the "This flag is not currently implemented."
on the man page is wrong, i think?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no?
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] ctime.3: EXAMPLES: Add example program
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] ctime.3: EXAMPLES: Add example program
Previous by thread: [PATCH] ctime.3: Document how to check errors from mktime(3)
Next by thread: Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux