Hi Vincent, On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 01:56:10PM GMT, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The current "If x is 0" condition is a bit misleading because "is" > is not the equality test (just like when saying "x is NaN") and 0 > as a FP number stands for +0, while this condition should apply to > both -0 and +0. > Replace this condition by "If x is +0 or -0". > > Replace "Nan" by "NaN" (typography used everywhere else). > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Thanks! Have a lovely day! Alex > --- > man/man3/nextup.3 | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man/man3/nextup.3 b/man/man3/nextup.3 > index 285c2bcda..568f3b13f 100644 > --- a/man/man3/nextup.3 > +++ b/man/man3/nextup.3 > @@ -38,8 +38,9 @@ is the smallest representable negative number in the corresponding type, > these functions return \-0. > If > .I x > -is 0, the returned value is the smallest representable positive number > -of the corresponding type. > +is +0 or \-0, > +the returned value is > +the smallest representable positive number of the corresponding type. > .P > If > .I x > @@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ of the corresponding type. > .P > If > .I x > -is Nan, > +is NaN, > the returned value is NaN. > .P > The value returned by > -- > 2.45.2 > > -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
