Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] landlock.7, landlock_*.2: Document Landlock ABI version 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





8/6/2024 1:19 PM, Alejandro Colomar пишет:
Hi Konstantin,

You didn't write anything in this message, right?  Was it an accident?

Sorry. I wrote a message but did it on the same line with the patch code. Here below I rewrite it.

Have a lovely day!
Alex

On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 11:38:57AM GMT, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:


7/23/2024 1:19 PM, Günther Noack пишет:
> Landlock ABI 4 restricts bind(2) and connect(2) on TCP port numbers.
> > The intent is to bring the man pages mostly in line with the kernel
> documentation again.  I intentionally did not add networking support to the
> usage example in landlock.7 - I feel that in the long run, we would be better
> advised to maintain longer example code in the kernel samples.
> > Closes: <https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/32>
> Cc: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2       | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   man/man2/landlock_create_ruleset.2 | 12 ++++-
>   man/man7/landlock.7                | 23 ++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2 b/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
> index 7a83bb303..489e9c354 100644
> --- a/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
> +++ b/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
> @@ -20,15 +20,14 @@ Standard C library
>   .BI "            const void *" rule_attr ", uint32_t " flags );
>   .fi
>   .SH DESCRIPTION
> -A Landlock rule describes an action on an object.
> -An object is currently a file hierarchy,
> -and the related filesystem actions
> -are defined with a set of access rights.
> -This
> +A Landlock rule describes an action on an object
> +which the process intends to perform.
> +A set of rules is aggregated in a ruleset,
> +which can then restrict the thread enforcing it, and its future children.
> +.P
> +The
>   .BR landlock_add_rule ()
> -system call enables adding a new Landlock rule to an existing ruleset
> -created with
> -.BR landlock_create_ruleset (2).
> +system call adds a new Landlock rule to an existing ruleset.
>   See
>   .BR landlock (7)
>   for a global overview.
> @@ -42,10 +41,15 @@ identifies the structure type pointed to by
>   .IR rule_attr .
>   Currently, Linux supports the following
>   .I rule_type
> -value:
> +values:
>   .TP
>   .B LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH
> -This defines the object type as a file hierarchy.
> +For these rules,
> +the object is a file hierarchy,
> +and the related filesystem actions
> +are defined with
> +.IR "filesystem access rights" .
> +.IP
>   In this case,
>   .I rule_attr
>   points to the following structure:
> @@ -74,6 +78,45 @@ is an opened file descriptor, preferably with the
>   flag,
>   which identifies the parent directory of the file hierarchy or
>   just a file.
> +.TP
> +.B LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT
> +For these rules,
> +the object is a TCP port,
> +and the related actions are defined with
> +.IR "network access rights" .
> +.IP
> +In this case,
> +.I rule_attr
> +points to the following structure:
> +.IP
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> +    __u64 allowed_access;
> +    __u64 port;
> +};
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.IP
> +.i allowed_access
> +contains a bitmask of allowed network actions,
> +which can be applied on the given port.
> +.IP
> +.i port
> +is the network port in host endianness.
> +.IP
> +It should be noted that port 0 passed to
> +.BR bind (2)
> +will bind to an available port from the ephemeral port range.
> +This can be configured in the
> +.I /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
> +sysctl (also used for IPv6).
> +.IP
> +A Landlock rule with port 0
> +and the
> +.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP
> +right means that requesting to bind on port 0 is allowed
> +and it will automatically translate to binding on the related port range.
>   .P
>   .I flags
>   must be 0.
> @@ -89,6 +132,12 @@ is set to indicate the error.
>   .BR landlock_add_rule ()
>   can fail for the following reasons:
>   .TP
> +.B EAFNOSUPPORT
> +.I rule_type
> +is
> +.BR LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT ,
> +but TCP is not supported by the running kernel.
> +.TP
>   .B EOPNOTSUPP
>   Landlock is supported by the kernel but disabled at boot time.
>   .TP
> @@ -111,6 +160,11 @@ are only applicable to directories, but
>   .I \%rule_attr\->parent_fd
>   does not refer to a directory).
>   .TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +In
> +.IR \%struct\~landlock_net_port_attr ,
> +the port number is greater than 65535.
> +.TP
>   .B ENOMSG
>   Empty accesses (i.e.,
>   .I rule_attr\->allowed_access
> diff --git a/man/man2/landlock_create_ruleset.2 b/man/man2/landlock_create_ruleset.2
> index 105e9b062..ca635ddbc 100644
> --- a/man/man2/landlock_create_ruleset.2
> +++ b/man/man2/landlock_create_ruleset.2
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ It points to the following structure:
>   .EX
>   struct landlock_ruleset_attr {
>       __u64 handled_access_fs;
> +    __u64 handled_access_net;
>   };
>   .EE
>   .in
> @@ -52,6 +53,13 @@ is a bitmask of handled filesystem actions
>   in
>   .BR landlock (7)).
>   .IP
> +.I handled_access_net
> +is a bitmask of handled network actions
> +(see
> +.B Network actions
> +in
> +.BR landlock (7)).
> +.IP
>   This structure defines a set of
>   .IR "handled access rights" ,
>   a set of actions on different object types,
> @@ -143,8 +151,8 @@ was not a valid address.
>   .TP
>   .B ENOMSG
>   Empty accesses (i.e.,
> -.I attr\->handled_access_fs
> -is 0).
> +.I attr
> +did not specify any access rights to restrict).
>   .SH STANDARDS
>   Linux.
>   .SH HISTORY
> diff --git a/man/man7/landlock.7 b/man/man7/landlock.7
> index 652054f15..52876a3de 100644
> --- a/man/man7/landlock.7
> +++ b/man/man7/landlock.7
> @@ -189,6 +189,19 @@ If multiple requirements are not met, the
>   error code takes precedence over
>   .BR EXDEV .
>   .\"
> +.SS Network flags
> +These flags enable to restrict a sandboxed process
> +to a set of network actions.
> +This is supported since the Landlock ABI version 4.
> +.P
> +The following access rights apply to TCP port numbers:
> +.TP
> +.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP
> +Bind a TCP socket to a local port.
> +.TP
> +.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP
> +Connect an active TCP socket to a remote port.
> +.\"
>   .SS Layers of file path access rights
>   Each time a thread enforces a ruleset on itself,
>   it updates its Landlock domain with a new layer of policy.
> @@ -339,6 +352,9 @@ _	_	_
>   2	5.19	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER
>   _	_	_
>   3	6.2	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE
> +_	_	_
> +4	6.7	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP
> +\^	\^	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP
>   .TE
>   .P
>   Users should use the Landlock ABI version rather than the kernel version
> @@ -439,9 +455,10 @@ and only use the available subset of access rights:
>    * numbers hardcoded to keep the example short.
>    */
>   __u64 landlock_fs_access_rights[] = {
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM << 1) \- 1,  /* v1                 */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER    << 1) \- 1,  /* v2: add "refer"    */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE << 1) \- 1,  /* v3: add "truncate" */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM  << 1) \- 1,  /* v1                  */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER     << 1) \- 1,  /* v2: add "refer"     */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE  << 1) \- 1,  /* v3: add "truncate"  */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE  << 1) \- 1,  /* v4: TCP support     */   Double "LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE  << 1", I think its a mistype here.
Double "LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE << 1", I think its a mistype here or its ok??
	
>   };
>   \&
>   int abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux