On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 08:43:40PM GMT, наб wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 08:42:14PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 07:53:34PM GMT, наб wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 06:38:42PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:03:40AM GMT, наб wrote: > > > > > > Applies to Linux and NetBSD. > > > > > Is this non-standard behavior? > > > > In the case of setitimer(): "obviously yes" because the interface is > > > > not part of the standard. > > > The POSIX.1-2008 standard specifies setitimer(3p). > > But the current standard (-2024) doesn't. > Hmmm, do you want to send a patch for that? absolutely not, even the subset I have for voreutils was hell > Anyway, for 2008, was it non-standard behavior? It wasn't "non-standard" so much as it was left up to the implementation (still is), except for timer_create(). All implementations agree here, so there's no point in splitting hair IMO Best,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
