Hi наб, On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 08:44:26PM GMT, наб wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 08:43:36PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 07:57:34PM GMT, наб wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 06:57:29PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > > > -%[$][flags][width][.precision][length modifier]conversion > > > > > +%[argument$][flags][width][.precision][length modifier]conversion > > > > Maybe argnum is clearer? > > > Considered it, but nothing else in this string is contracted. > > > If it were > > > %[argnum$][flags][width][.prec][length]conv > > > then sure. > > > > > > I don't think it matters, really, but "argument" reads better with the > > > full words. If you like argnum better then feel free to editorialise to > > > that. > > How about [position$] ? > Don't think so, argnum is better than position IMO I've applied the original patch. Thanks! Have a lovely day! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
