Hi Branden, On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:39:45PM GMT, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > [trimming CC list for this formatting issue] > > At 2024-06-25T14:56:04-0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > [...] > > -.in +4n > > +.in +1n > > .TS > > lB l. > > STATX_TYPE Want stx_mode & S_IFMT > > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ .SH DESCRIPTION > > STATX_MNT_ID Want stx_mnt_id (since Linux 5.8) > > STATX_DIOALIGN Want stx_dio_mem_align and stx_dio_offset_align > > (since Linux 6.1; support varies by filesystem) > > +STATX_MNT_ID_UNIQUE Want unique stx_mnt_id (since Linux 6.8) > > .TE > > In my opinion this would have been better done by retaining the existing > indentation and changing the table to (1) expand the right-hand column > with the "x" column modifier and (2) using text blocks for lengthy items > in the right column. tbl(1) in groff 1.23.0 covers this ground. > > Alex, your acceptance of this patch isn't showing up for me yet. > > $ git remote get-url origin > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages/ > > I guess it's only on your staging site so far? Yep; it's on my staging site. And I agree; I dislike that +1n. But I didn't come up with a good solution. > > Anyway, let me know if you agree. Sure. Do you want to send a patch against my remote? Have a lovely night! Alex > > Regards, > Branden -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
