Re: [PATCH 02/12] tzset: state vars unspecified if geographical TZ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paul,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 03:30:54PM GMT, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 6/11/24 13:53, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > +The
> > > +.BR tzset ()
> > > +function initializes these variables to unspecified values if this
> > Can you confirm that the wording is precise?
> 
> Yes, see:
> 
> https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1816
> 
> > If it initializes to unspecified values, I guess it's legal (IIRC) to
> > read them (even if useless).  Am I understanding correctly?
> 
> Yes, so long as you've called tzset either directly or indirectly. If you've
> never called tzset then it is a gray area (are they initialized? it would be
> strange if not, but the standards aren't clear).

Thanks.

> By the way, a FUTURE DIRECTIONS section of POSIX will plan to remove the
> variables (see the URL above). Perhaps you could add a FUTURE DIRECTIONS
> section?

Hmmm.  There's prior art in POSIX, so I guess we can use that name.
Wanna send a patch or two?  :)

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux