Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 6/8] x86/shstk: Add return uprobe support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Let me repeat I know nothing about shadow stacks, only tried to
read Documentation/arch/x86/shstk.rst few minutes ago ;)

On 05/13, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> 1) current uretprobe which are not working at the moment and we change
>    the top value of shadow stack with shstk_push_frame
> 2) optimized uretprobe which needs to push new frame on shadow stack
>    with shstk_update_last_frame
>
> I think we should do 1) and have current uretprobe working with shadow
> stack, which is broken at the moment

Agreed,

> I'm ok with not using optimized uretprobe when shadow stack is detected
> as enabled and we go with current uretprobe in that case

But how can we detect it? Again, suppose userspace does

	enable_shstk()
	{
		prctl(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
	}

what if enable_shstk() is ret-probed ?

Oleg.





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux