Hi Alex, Surprised I missed this message. Better late than never, I hope... >> .TP >> +.BR MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE " (since Linux 6.9)" >> +.\" commit fa3bea4e1f8202d787709b7e3654eb0a99aed758 >> +This mode interleaves page allocations across the nodes specified in >> +.I nodemask >> +according to the weights in >> +.IR /sys/kernel/mm/mempolicy/weighted_interleave . >> +For example, if bits 0, 2, and 5 are raised in > > I've checked that there's no other use of "raise" for saying that a bit > is set, in the Linux man-pages project (or I couldn't find it). Let's > say "set", which is far more common, I think. > Sounds good; will go back and edit. >> or >> .B MPOL_LOCAL >> @@ -199,6 +200,23 @@ the memory bandwidth of a single node. >> .\" To be effective the memory area should be fairly large, >> .\" at least 1 MB or bigger. >> .TP >> +.BR MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE " (since Linux 6.9)" >> +.\" commit fa3bea4e1f8202d787709b7e3654eb0a99aed758 >> +This mode interleaves page allocations across the nodes specified in >> +.I nodemask >> +according to the weights in >> +.IR /sys/kernel/mm/mempolicy/weighted_interleave . >> +For example, if bits 0, 2, and 5 are raised in > > Same here. > > Other than that, the patch LGTM. Thanks! > > Have a lovely day! > Alex Same to you! Glad to wrap this up. Svetly
