Hello, In the man-pages(7) document, as rendered at: http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/share/dist/man-pages/git/HEAD/man-pages-HEAD.pdf#man-pages.7 under the section heading "FORMATTING AND WORDING CONVENTIONS", and subsection "Formatting conventions (general)", close to the bottom of page 9, I see: > Any reference to another man page should be written with the name in > bold, always followed by the section number, formatted in Roman > (normal) font, without any separating spaces (e.g., intro(2)). The > preferred way to write this in the source file is: > > .BR intro (2) I have noticed that, as of groff-1.23, both groff_man(7), and the macro package which it documents, flagrantly ignore, and indeed violate this convention. I further notice that man-pages(7) document, from which I have quoted, above, appears to have been formatted using that very version of groff_man(7), perhaps with the intro(2) reference, within the quoted paragraph, having been formatted using: .MR intro 2 rather than the recommended: .BR intro (2) This leads to a glaring anomaly, within the quoted paragraph; rather than the topic name "intro" being set in bold, as the convention demands, it is set in (non-bold) italics! In my personal opinion, FWIW, the use of italics in this context is just plain ugly. Opinion aside, it does not conform to the convention, as it is stated in man-pages(7) -- either the convention needs to be changed, by common consent, or groff_man(7) needs to be brought to heel. -- Regards, Keith.