Hi Lennart, On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:37:43AM +0000, Lennart Jablonka wrote: > Quoth Alejandro Colomar: > > I've found now why my MUAs don't include you in the reply. I've seen > > the following header in your message. I don't know if this is something > > you configured your MUA to send, or if it's an accident. Please have a > > look. > > > > Mail-Followup-To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>, > > Guillem Jover <guillem@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > The Mail-Followup-To header field is good and useful. And Mutt, for > example, sends it by default, if you’re properly using `lists` and > `subscribe`. “I’m subscribed to this list anyway, so you need not send > followups to me separately as well.” Hmm, it's interesting. It messes with what's To and what's Cc, but it's better than just replying to the list, which I hate because you never know who's subscribed to it (e.g., most people in the groff@ mailing list don't send me a copy of their responses, and I'm not subscribed to the list; or in other lists, even if I'm subscribed to the list, I won't read most stuff unless either the subject looks interesting or I'm To or Cc). > More people should use and honor it. While I'll keep not using it, I'll honor it, now I understand it. :) > /me unignores mail-followup-to Have a lovely day! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
