Hi Elliott, On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:18:28PM -0800, enh wrote: > thanks! https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/bionic/+/2987070 > changes to > > /** > * [clock_nanosleep(2)](http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clock_nanosleep.2.html) > * sleeps for the given time (or until the given time if the TIMER_ABSTIME flag > * is used), as measured by the given clock. > * > * Returns 0 on success, and returns -1 and returns an error number on failure. > * If the sleep was interrupted by a signal, the return value will be `EINTR` > * and `remainder` will be the amount of time remaining. > */ > int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t __clock, int __flags, const struct > timespec* _Nonnull __time, struct timespec* _Nullable __remainder); Hmmmm, that's the best name, meaningfully, I think. But I've been trying to avoid it. I don't like using names of standard functions in identifiers; it might confuse. As an alternative, I thought of 't'. What do you think? Have a lovely night! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
