Hi Elliott, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:12:12PM -0800, enh wrote: > (apologies for the post without a patch but...) No worries. :) > fyi, i noticed that there's no reference to _Fork() anywhere. i'd send > a patch, but given that vfork() has a page to itself, i'm assuming > just adding a paragraph to fork(2) isn't the plan? Hmmm, I didn't know about the existence of _Fork(). It looks like _Exit(3) and exit(3), right? Maybe we could write a page based on _Exit(3). What do you think? Have a lovely night! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
