Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
From: наб <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:29:17 +0100
Cc: linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <ZYQctE0y1UTy6VvK@debian>
References: <tovce255glwqzbrwuwk3ijzzrww3si4q3jdoh4sdw5zgah7ki7@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz> <ZYQctE0y1UTy6VvK@debian>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20231103-116-3b855e-dirty

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:31:35AM +0100, наб wrote:
> > But this does mean that since 5.12 supports
> Did you mean "since 5.12, _it_ supports"?
yes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

References:
- [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
  - From: наб
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] unix.7: SO_PEERCRED: Mention listen(2)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile.2: pull in_fd type requirements up to 6.7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux