Re: strtol(3) setting of errno

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: strtol(3) setting of errno
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:00:30 +0100
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux man-pages <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@xxxxxxxxxx>, shadow <~hallyn/shadow@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <ZWhUR9AqoSLKeT46@debian> (Alejandro Colomar's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:22:09 +0100")
References: <ZWhUR9AqoSLKeT46@debian>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux)

* Alejandro Colomar:

> Now I realize that commit was probably wrong, and one needs to check
> both errno and the return value to determine that the call failed.  Can
> you please confirm what the correct specification of strtol(3) is?

The most detailed specification we have is the one that is in POSIX.

Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: strtol(3) setting of errno
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

References:
- strtol(3) setting of errno
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

Prev by Date: strtol(3) setting of errno
Next by Date: Re: strtol(3) setting of errno
Previous by thread: strtol(3) setting of errno
Next by thread: Re: strtol(3) setting of errno
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux