On 10/11/2023 10:40, Stefan Puiu wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:33 PM Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [.....]
>> strncpy(3):
>> CAVEATS
>> The name of these functions is confusing. These functions produce a
>> null‐padded character sequence, not a string (see string_copying(7)).
>
> I'm a bit confused by this distinction. Isn't a null-padded sequence
> technically also null-terminated? If there's a '0' at the end, then
> it's a string, in my understanding. Or was the intention to say "a
> character sequence that may be null-padded", where the case in which
> there's no padding at all being the reason for the distinction?
This is a null padded sequence of characters in an array:
char buf[4] = {'a', '\0', '\0', '\0'};
I'm sure we are all well aware from this long email thread, strncpy is designed to fill fixed sized arrays, and pad with NUL bytes '\0' if any space left. Otherwise, the array buffer is left not padded.. there in lies the trouble, a possibly not terminated sequence of characters. Someone thought saving the extra byte was a good idea. It would have been better if that programmer had crafted their own local function rather than put out the strncpy function which is similarly named to strcpy(), they could have called it copy_to_array_nul_pad().
// a not terminated array - using printf, or strlen will carry on reading off down the memory until it finds a NUL byte '\0', perhaps reading out side the addressable space of the process, causing a SEGV.
char buf[4] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'};
Hope that helps.
Kind regards, Jonny
