Hi Helge, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:02:12PM +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Without further ado, the following was found: > > Issue 1: alphabetic? > Issue 2: multiple cases → both cases? Depending on the locale, more than 2 are possible, AFAIK, so multiple would be more accurate in that context, I think. Cheers, Alex > > "If case-independent matching is specified, the effect is much as if all case " > "distinctions had vanished from the alphabet. When an alphabetic that exists " > "in multiple cases appears as an ordinary character outside a bracket " > "expression, it is effectively transformed into a bracket expression " > "containing both cases, for example, \\[aq]x\\[aq] becomes \"I<[xX]>\". When " > "it appears inside a bracket expression, all case counterparts of it are " > "added to the bracket expression, so that, for example, \"I<[x]>\" becomes " > "\"I<[xX]>\" and \"I<[\\[ha]x]>\" becomes \"I<[\\[ha]xX]>\"." -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
