On 10/19/23 6:29 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:12:44PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes since v1: >> - Employ sementic new lines by breaking sentence before "by" >> --- >> man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 >> index e68085262..f6cafd9a2 100644 >> --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 >> +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 >> @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ If this feature bit is set, >> the kernel supports resolving faults with the >> .B UFFDIO_POISON >> ioctl. >> +.TP >> +.BR UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC " (since Linux 6.7)" > > Has this feature been merged? Yes, This patch is in maintainer's tree (in mm-stable these day). https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231018213452.A78A8C433C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It should be released with next kernel release. I'm not sure if you can accept a patch which isn't in Linus's tree yet. But these patches are already in maintainer's tree and in linux-next from almost a month. > > Thanks, > Alex > >> +If this feature bit is set, >> +the write protection faults would be asynchronously resolved >> +by the kernel. >> .PP >> The returned >> .I ioctls >> -- >> 2.42.0 >> > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum