Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> This is a new feature recently added to the kernel. So, document the new
> ioctl the same way we do other UFFDIO_* ioctls.
> 
> Also note the corresponding new ioctl flag we can return in response to
> a UFFDIO_REGISTER call.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the patch and the review.  Patch applied.

Cheers,
Alex

> ---
>  man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> index 40528001e..a9131515c 100644
> --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ operation is supported.
>  The
>  .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
>  operation is supported.
> +.TP
> +.B 1 << _UFFDIO_POISON
> +The
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation is supported.
>  .PP
>  This
>  .BR ioctl (2)
> @@ -886,6 +891,12 @@ does not equal the value that was specified in the
>  .I range.len
>  field.
>  .TP
> +.B EEXIST
> +One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +No existing page could be found in the page cache for the given range.
> +.TP
>  .B EINVAL
>  Either
>  .I range.start
> @@ -900,9 +911,6 @@ An invalid bit was specified in the
>  .I mode
>  field.
>  .TP
> -.B EEXIST
> -One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> -.TP
>  .B ENOENT
>  The faulting process has changed its virtual memory layout simultaneously with
>  an outstanding
> @@ -912,14 +920,118 @@ operation.
>  .B ENOMEM
>  Allocating memory needed to setup the page table mappings failed.
>  .TP
> -.B EFAULT
> -No existing page could be found in the page cache for the given range.
> -.TP
>  .B ESRCH
>  The faulting process has exited at the time of a
>  .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
>  operation.
>  .\"
> +.SS UFFDIO_POISON
> +(Since Linux 6.6.)
> +Mark an address range as "poisoned".
> +Future accesses to these addresses will raise a
> +.B SIGBUS
> +signal.
> +Unlike
> +.B MADV_HWPOISON
> +this works by installing page table entries,
> +rather than "really" poisoning the underlying physical pages.
> +This means it only affects this particular address space.
> +.PP
> +The
> +.I argp
> +argument is a pointer to a
> +.I uffdio_poison
> +structure as shown below:
> +.PP
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +struct uffdio_poison {
> +	struct uffdio_range range;
> +	                /* Range to install poison PTE markers in */
> +	__u64 mode;     /* Flags controlling the behavior of poison */
> +	__s64 updated;  /* Number of bytes poisoned, or negated error */
> +};
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.PP
> +The following value may be bitwise ORed in
> +.I mode
> +to change the behavior of the
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation:
> +.TP
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON_MODE_DONTWAKE
> +Do not wake up the thread that waits for page-fault resolution.
> +.PP
> +The
> +.I updated
> +field is used by the kernel
> +to return the number of bytes that were actually poisoned,
> +or an error in the same manner as
> +.BR UFFDIO_COPY .
> +If the value returned in the
> +.I updated
> +field doesn't match the value that was specified in
> +.IR range.len ,
> +the operation fails with the error
> +.BR EAGAIN .
> +The
> +.I updated
> +field is output-only;
> +it is not read by the
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.PP
> +This
> +.BR ioctl (2)
> +operation returns 0 on success.
> +In this case,
> +the entire area was poisoned.
> +On error, \-1 is returned and
> +.I errno
> +is set to indicate the error.
> +Possible errors include:
> +.TP
> +.B EAGAIN
> +The number of bytes mapped
> +(i.e., the value returned in the
> +.I updated
> +field)
> +does not equal the value that was specified in the
> +.I range.len
> +field.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +Either
> +.I range.start
> +or
> +.I range.len
> +was not a multiple of the system page size; or
> +.I range.len
> +was zero; or the range specified was invalid.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +An invalid bit was specified in the
> +.I mode
> +field.
> +.TP
> +.B EEXIST
> +One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOENT
> +The faulting process has changed its virtual memory layout simultaneously with
> +an outstanding
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOMEM
> +Allocating memory for page table entries failed.
> +.TP
> +.B ESRCH
> +The faulting process has exited at the time of a
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.\"
>  .SH RETURN VALUE
>  See descriptions of the individual operations, above.
>  .SH ERRORS
> -- 
> 2.42.0.655.g421f12c284-goog
> 

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux