Hi Siddhesh, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > Should we maybe keep this example, and suggest using it with sandboxing? > > Or is it not useful anymore? > > I don't see the point TBH. The point was to add another layer of security, in case the sanboxing is not perfect. > I wouldn't mind if that example was replaced > with lddtree as the alternative since it is functionally equivalent. However > it would be a safer recommendation to put that too inside a sandbox because > IMO you'd generally never want to run or even analyze arbitrary executables > without proper sandboxing. Sure, I didn't know about lddtree. Feel free to use it. Thanks, Alex P.S.: I'm deprecating <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>. Please use <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>. -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
