Hi Serge, On 2023-08-13 15:35, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: [...] > > Well no, I don't think that's right. That implies that the > CLONE_PARENT check was a long standing one. In fact, the > point was that it was a regression introduced in > > 40a0d32d1 (Wed Sep 11 14:19:41 2013 -0700) > > and then fixed in 1f7f4dde5 two months later. Thanks! I'll rewrite the commit accordingly (more like Sargun's v1) and include this info. Cheers, Alex > >> +either. >> .TP >> .B CLONE_NEWUSER >> (This flag first became meaningful for >> -- >> 2.40.1 -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
