On 2023-07-18 17:07, наб wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:42:08PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 2023-07-18 01:31, наб wrote: >>> Also, administriva-wise, git pull tells me >>> [PATCH 1/2] statfs.2: unshade as deprecated, but direct to statvfs(3) >>> with msgid >>> <b4b871ffdf8f764ffd6c25039f3944b08748bd3e.1687553930.git.nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> is the last outstanding patch I have rn, sans this one. >> I was waiting for you to send an v2 with the fs and inode corrections >> suggested by Tom Schwindl. Is that correct? > You applied 2/2 but I got no responses for 1/2. > Scissoring a rebased 1/2 below. > > Update-wise: musl@ told me they basically agree and will apply it > when glibc does, and I got the glibc first round of reviews and the > hurd half stamped, but it's now entered the "resend every week to > no response" stage that all glibc patches go through. > > When those land I'll probably re-shade the declarations, turn the > paragraph into "use the standard statvfs(3) interface instead, but > see VERSIONS if using f_type" and extract the magicks to, like, > fs-magic(7) or whatever. Ok. Thanks! > > Best, > -- >8 -- > Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 22:49:22 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] statfs.2: Unshade as deprecated, but direct to statvfs(3) > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/f54kudgblgk643u32tb6at4cd3kkzha6hslahv24szs4raroaz@ogivjbfdaqtb/t/#u > Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Cheers, Alex > --- > man2/statfs.2 | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man2/statfs.2 b/man2/statfs.2 > index 0496ab6c9..307a29b3a 100644 > --- a/man2/statfs.2 > +++ b/man2/statfs.2 > @@ -15,9 +15,15 @@ .SH SYNOPSIS > .nf > .BR "#include <sys/vfs.h> " "/* or <sys/statfs.h> */" > .PP > -.BI "[[deprecated]] int statfs(const char *" path ", struct statfs *" buf ); > -.BI "[[deprecated]] int fstatfs(int " fd ", struct statfs *" buf ); > +.BI "int statfs(const char *" path ", struct statfs *" buf ); > +.BI "int fstatfs(int " fd ", struct statfs *" buf ); > .fi > +.PP > +Unless you need the > +.I f_type > +field, you should use the standard > +.BR statvfs (3) > +interface instead. > .SH DESCRIPTION > The > .BR statfs () -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
