On 7/8/23 17:29, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On 6/19/23 13:49, Rob Linden wrote:Hello Alejandro!Hello Rob! Sorry for the delay; I've been on vacation. Please don't start new threads for continuing an old one, as it makes it difficult to follow. Is this just a resend of the previous patch?
Can you please resend any patches that you sent as a new patch set, with all of them together? Thanks, Alex
Thanks, AlexI think there is a mistake on the manpage for recv. In the description ofthe flag MSG_ERRQUEUE it says that data is passed via "msg_iovec". This isprobably referring to msg_iov in struct msghdr (from /usr/include/bits/socket.h). A "msg_iovec" doesn't seem to exist. Maybe it was spelled wrong because it's of type struct iovec. If it is indeed wrong then the following patch corrects it: Signed-off-by: Rob Linden <rlinden@xxxxxxxxxx> From 830a1b1233eb69bd8a4a64296581d094fb0edc46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rokkbert <rokkbert@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 10:00:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] recv.2: field msg_iov in struct msghdr is wrongly called msg_iovec. Corrected to msg_iov. --- man2/recv.2 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man2/recv.2 b/man2/recv.2 index 27d6d612c..62e43c9aa 100644 --- a/man2/recv.2 +++ b/man2/recv.2 @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ and for more information. The payload of the original packet that caused the error is passed as normal data via -.IR msg_iovec . +.IR msg_iov . The original destination address of the datagram that caused the error is supplied via .IR msg_name . -- 2.39.2 All the best, rob
-- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
