Re: [PATCH 2/2] userfaultfd.2: fix userfaultfd_demo output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On 4/10/23 21:57, Nadav Amit wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 8, 2023, at 6:34 AM, Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nadav,
>>
>> On 3/7/22 19:48, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> A bug in the kernel caused in recent version a different output (masked
>>> offset). Update the output of the demo program accordingly.
>>
>> I'd like to have some more information about this in the commit message.
>> I don't really understand it.  When was the bug introduced?  When was it
>> fixed?  Was the example in the page created in a buggy version?
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> Sorry for the late response.
> 
> The bug was introduced in 1a29d85eb0f1 ("mm: use vmf->address instead of of
> vmf->virtual_address”) which is circa 2016. It was introduced shortly after
> userfaultfd, so it was determined that no users are likely to rely on the
> intended correct behavior that was documented in the man page, but there
> might be users who relied on the wrong behavior, which was in the code
> for several years.
> 
> More information is available in the patch of the fix:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220226022655.350562-1-namit@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Let me know if it answers you questions, and whether you want me to send
> an updated patch for the man page.

Yes, please, a patch including all this response in the message would be
useful.

Thanks!
Alex

> 

-- 
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux