Hi! On 4/20/23 15:24, наб wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 03:13:54PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 4/20/23 15:02, наб wrote: >>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ or >>> .B REG_NEWLINE >>> processing. >>> This flag is a BSD extension, not present in POSIX. >>> -.SS Byte offsets >>> +.SS Match offsets >> I think it might be a bit clearer as "Subexpression match offsets" or >> something like that? What do you think? > Nah; in a significant amount of scenarios you don't care about > subexpressions at all, and the one thing you're guaranteed to get is, > well, the non-subexpression match. > Saying "Subexpression match offsets" to mean "Match offsets, including > of subexpressions" is more confusing, and which offsets are returned is > explained in running text. Ahh, sorry; I was myself confused. I thought the section was only about subexpressions, which is why I found confusing that the title was not more explicit. Being about the main match + subexp, your title is better. I'll apply this patch in a moment, after I push my SYNOPSIS patch, based on your 2/6, since I found there are 2 places where _Nullable should go, not one. Best, Alex > > Best, P.S.: That comma without continuation feels very awkward to me :) -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
