Hi, On 4/1/23 03:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-03-31 21:35:19 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 3/31/23 16:33, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> When a precision is given, the 0 flag is ignored only for integer >>> conversions, not for all numeric conversions. >> >> I think I've seen some related discussion in some other list, >> right? Could you please link to it in the commit message? > > If you mean my message "printf: 0 flag and given precision for %b" in > the libc-alpha list, then this does not concern the printf man page > yet, because this man page currently does not mention %b at all (%b > is rather new, and not in the current C standard). This should be > added to the man page, but this is not trivial, and I think that the > inconsistency I've mentioned should be resolve in one way or the > other before %b is added to the man page (in order to make sure that > it does not contain something that could become obsolete). > > So, does one really need the link in the commit message, while %b is > not in the man page yet? Nah, I thought it might have something to do with it. I applied the patch. Thanks, Alex > -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
