Re: [patch v2] aligned_alloc: conform to C17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/17/23 22:15, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> BTW, I guess C11 was equivalent to C17 in this regard, or was this
>> changed in C17?
> 
> C17 seems to be a "bugfix" for C11.  In this case, one of the
> requirements for aligned_alloc() in C11 was, well, silly.  It was
> removed in C17.

Ahh nice, I knew C17 was a bugfix, but never really knew any of the
bugs it fixed.  Now I know one.  :)

And yet it seems that the wording is still a bit buggy with that
"nonnegative integral power of two" thingy.  :p

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux