Hi Helge, On 3/12/23 05:57, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Alex, > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 11:24:53PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 3/11/23 18:13, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >>> Without further ado, the following was found: >>> >>> Issue: PAM → B<PAM>(7) >>> >>> "The session keyring is a keyring used to anchor keys on behalf of a " >>> "process. It is typically created by B<pam_keyinit>(8) when a user logs in " >>> "and a link will be added that refers to the B<user-keyring>(7). Optionally, " >>> "PAM may revoke the session keyring on logout. (In typical configurations, " >>> "PAM does do this revocation.) The session keyring has the name " >>> "(description) I<_ses>." >> >> I think I prefer not doing this change, since we already have a reference >> to PAM(7) in the SEE ALSO section, and it would clutter the description >> to add more formatting to it. I'm doubting. > > Ok. > > Just that in HTML view, these are often turned into hyperlinks, thus > people could easily continue reading (like in any HTML article). But I > don't know how many people are actually doing this. > > (And of course knowing that PAM(7) even exists in the text is not too > bad, either). I decided to add a man-page reference in the first occurence. Cheers, Alex > > Greetings > > Helge > > -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
