Hi Helge, On 1/22/23 20:31, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Without further ado, the following was found: Issue 1: runlevel 2 → run-level 2 Issue 2: sendmail → B<sendmail>(8) "To define the starting or stopping order within the same run-level, the name" "of a link contains an B<order-number>. Also, for clarity, the name of a" "link usually ends with the name of the service to which it refers. For" "example, the link I</etc/rc2.d/S80sendmail> starts the sendmail service on" "runlevel 2. This happens after I</etc/rc2.d/S12syslog> is run but before I</" "etc/rc2.d/S90xfs> is run."
I believe the fix would be to use runlevel everywhere. run-level is not correct under any point of view, if I'm correct. It should be runlevel for a new term formed specifically for programming purposes, or run level for normal English.
Branden, can you confirm? Cheers, Alex -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
