Hi Helge, On 1/22/23 20:31, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Without further ado, the following was found: Issue: in enabled → is enabled
This has been fixed already:
commit 90e82844c53e5ac03da5ca58865db6b407b50c0a
Author: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun Dec 4 20:57:54 2022 +0100
symlink.2: tfix
Reported-by: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>
"The permissions of a symbolic link are irrelevant; the ownership is ignored" "when following the link (except when the I<protected_symlinks> feature is" "enabled, as explained in B<proc>(5)), but is checked when removal or" "renaming of the link is requested and the link is in a directory with the" "sticky bit (B<S_ISVTX>) set."
Cheers, Alex -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
