Re: [PATCH] scanf.3: Do not mention the ERANGE error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zack,

On 12/29/22 17:35, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:47:06 -0500, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On 12/29/22 07:39, Zack Weinberg wrote:
To be clear, I personally don’t have plans to do any of the actual
programming or standard-changing work involved here.  :-)

Ah, no, I meant more that the whole set of glibc maintainers had that
in mind, as a long term plan (like 10 years maybe?).

Oh, OK.  Yeah, changes to the standard can easily take that long.

Before you start writing patches, I'm considering the following, which
is my way to say don't use these functions without deprecating them:

Split FILE and char* functions into separate manual pages.  In the one
for [v]sscanf(3), I'd keep the current documentation.  In the one for
FILE functions, I'd keep it very short, defering to sscanf(3) for
documentation of things like conversion specifiers, and that page
would only cover the bugs^Wdifferences that apply only to FILE
functions.

That seems like a good way forward to me.

I've done the splitting. If you would like to prepare any patches for adding BUGS, I'll take them :)

Cheers,

Alex


zw

--
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux