On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 06:03:07 -0500, Ian Abbott wrote: > And would ERANGE cause scanf to return EOF in the fixed > implementation? In the counterfactual universe where I actually patch scanf, yes. > That seems like it would break a lot of existing code > (even though it is currently UB). It would probably be better to > silently set errno to ERANGE without returning EOF My intuition says itʼs the other way around. What existing code do you expect will break? zw
