Re: [PATCH 01/10] fanotify_init.2: tfix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,

At 2022-08-20T01:28:04+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > -capability to create and intialize an fanotify group with limited functionality.
> > +capability to create and initialize an fanotify group with limited functionality.
> 
> should this be 'a fanotify' instead of 'an fanotify'?

Answering this requires people to document how the function/feature name
is supposed to be pronounced.  Use "an" if what follows is a vowel
sound.  Spelling is not a determining factor.

Unfortunately it is a tradition in Unix culture not to make
pronouciation of its lexicon of (historically) hermetically terse
identifier lexicon clear, so that the names of commands and functions
that are well known enough to come up in conversation at conventions can
be used a shibboleth to distinguish self-taught users and programmers
(and clueless sales personnel and would-be entrepreneurs) from
"authentic" Unix experts who underwent a proper apprenticeship, and
through a chain of masters, can trace their tutelage to a luminary at
the Bell Labs CSRC or UC Berkeley CSRG--someone with a name to be spoken
in hushed tones like "Ritchie" or "Joy".

Does "troff" have one syllable or two?  Does one refer to the text
editors as "ee-dee" and "vee-eye" or as if they were English diminutive
names "Ed" and "Vi"?  One set of choices will mark you as a person who
_might_ be worth conversing with; the other will get you a short look
down a long nose and the cold shoulder.  We've got gates to keep.

Both Unix and the Linux kernel, the latter particularly in its
development model, were levelling technologies.  They brought better OS
technology and programming environments to much larger groups of people
than had enjoyed them before.

But it is a sadly recurring theme of human history that as soon as some
levelling process occurs, a certain type of person promptly moves in to
restore a guild, caste, or other hierarchical social ordering that they
are more comfortable with.

If you can't get an authoritative answer from a principal author of the
fanotify API, I suggest reading the term as "eff-A-notify"; this will
then be implicitly documented by your choice of the article "an".  It
doesn't have anything to do with fans or the fourth degree of the major
scale, after all.

Regards,
Branden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux